Globalised vs averaged: Bias and ranking performance on the author level
作者：
Highlights：
• We compare the averaged and globalised aggregation approaches on the author level.
• We analyse the differences based on various normalised paper-level metrics.
• The differences in field bias are marginal.
• The globalised variant of percentile scores identifies influential researchers better.
• The differences between the variants for citation scores are generally insignificant.
摘要
•We compare the averaged and globalised aggregation approaches on the author level.•We analyse the differences based on various normalised paper-level metrics.•The differences in field bias are marginal.•The globalised variant of percentile scores identifies influential researchers better.•The differences between the variants for citation scores are generally insignificant.
论文关键词：Author impact indicators,Globalised vs. averaged,Field bias,Ranking evaluation,Test data
论文评审过程：Received 12 November 2018, Revised 12 January 2019, Accepted 12 January 2019, Available online 23 January 2019, Version of Record 23 January 2019.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.006
