Document–document similarity approaches and science mapping: Experimental comparison of five approaches

作者:

Highlights:

摘要

This paper treats document–document similarity approaches in the context of science mapping. Five approaches, involving nine methods, are compared experimentally. We compare text-based approaches, the citation-based bibliographic coupling approach, and approaches that combine text-based approaches and bibliographic coupling. Forty-three articles, published in the journal Information Retrieval, are used as test documents. We investigate how well the approaches agree with a ground truth subject classification of the test documents, when the complete linkage method is used, and under two types of similarities, first-order and second-order. The results show that it is possible to achieve a very good approximation of the classification by means of automatic grouping of articles. One text-only method and one combination method, under second-order similarities in both cases, give rise to cluster solutions that to a large extent agree with the classification.

论文关键词:Citation data,Textual data,Data source combination,Cluster analysis,Science mapping

论文评审过程:Author links open overlay panelPerAhlgrenaPersonEnvelopeCristianCollianderb

论文官网地址:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.003