Opus 4.7 Benchmark Details
Opus 4.7 currently shows benchmark results led by GPQA Diamond (6 / 270, score 94.20), GSO (1 / 21, score 44.12), MMLU (6 / 124, score 91.50). This page also compares it with 3 competitor models and 3 predecessor or same-series models, including performance and pricing views when available. 3 source links are attached for reference.
Benchmark Results
Benchmark Results
General Knowledge
16 evaluationsOther
3 evaluationsCoding and Software Engineer
7 evaluationsWriting and Creative Capabilities
1 evaluationsMath and Reasoning
4 evaluationsAI Agent - Tool Usage
6 evaluationsText Embedding
5 evaluationsCompetitor Comparison
Benchmark scores for Opus 4.7 compared against top models in its class
12 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | Opus 4.7Current | GPT-5.4 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | GPT-5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARC-AGI-1 综合评估 | 93.50Thinking Level · High | 93.70Thinking Level · Extra High | -- | 95.00Thinking Level · Extra High |
ARC-AGI-2 综合评估 | 75.80Thinking Level · High | 77.10Standard Mode | 77.10Thinking Level · High | 85.00Thinking Level · Extra High |
HLE 综合评估 | 54.70Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 52.10Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools | 51.40Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 52.20Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools |
LiveBench 综合评估 | 76.91Deep Thinking Mode | 80.28Deep Thinking Mode | 79.93Thinking Level · High | 80.71Deep Thinking Mode |
MMLU 综合评估 | 91.50Standard Mode | -- | 92.60Thinking Level · High | -- |
GPQA Diamond 科学与综合推理 | 94.20Extended Thinking | 92.80Thinking Level · Extra High | 94.30Thinking Level · High | 94.00Thinking Level · Extra High |
GSO 编程与软件工程 | 44.12Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 31.37Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools | 22.55Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 40.20Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools |
SWE-Bench Pro - Public 编程与软件工程 | 64.30Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 57.70Thinking Level · Extra High | 54.20Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 58.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools |
SWE-bench Verified 编程与软件工程 | 87.60Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | -- | 80.60Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | -- |
Text Arena (Coding) 编程与软件工程 | 1562.39Standard Mode | 1457.23Thinking Level · High | 1461.49Standard Mode | 1504.74Thinking Level · Extra High |
WeirdML v2 编程与软件工程 | 76.40Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 77.70Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools | 72.10Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 84.91Thinking Level · Extra High ｜ Tools |
Creative Writing 写作和创作 | 1906.40Standard Mode | 1835.50Standard Mode | 1488.80Standard Mode | 1844.00Standard Mode |
Standard API Pricing: Opus 4.7 vs. Peer Models
Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.
Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens
When a context threshold exists, the charted base price only applies within these limits:
| Model | Supplier | Standard input | Standard output | Base price applies to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Opus 4.7 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | — |
GPT-5.4 | OpenAI | $2.5 / 1M tokens | $15 / 1M tokens | — |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Google Deep Mind | $2 / 1M tokens | $12 / 1M tokens | <= 200K |
GPT-5.5 | OpenAI | $5 / 1M tokens | $30 / 1M tokens | — |
Version History
How each version of the Opus 4.7 series stacks up on benchmark tests
12 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.· Click a row to view its trend chart.
| Benchmark | Opus 4.7Current | Claude Opus 4.6 | Opus 4.5 | Opus 4.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ARC-AGI-1 综合评估 | 93.50Thinking Level · High | 92.00Extended Thinking | 80.00Extended Thinking | -- |
ARC-AGI-2 综合评估 | 75.80Thinking Level · High | 66.30Extended Thinking | 37.60Extended Thinking | -- |
HLE 综合评估 | 54.70Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 53.00Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 43.20Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | -- |
LiveBench 综合评估 | 76.91Deep Thinking Mode | 76.33Thinking Level · High | 75.9664K | 61.8132K |
MMLU 综合评估 | 91.50Standard Mode | 91.05Extended Thinking | -- | -- |
GPQA Diamond 科学与综合推理 | 94.20Extended Thinking | 91.31Extended Thinking | 87.00Extended Thinking | 81.00Extended Thinking |
GSO 编程与软件工程 | 44.12Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 41.20Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 26.50Standard Mode ｜ Tools | -- |
SWE-bench Verified 编程与软件工程 | 87.60Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 80.84Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 80.90Extended Thinking ｜ Tools | 74.50Extended Thinking ｜ Tools |
Text Arena (Coding) 编程与软件工程 | 1562.39Standard Mode | 1555.35Standard Mode | 1512.0032K | -- |
WeirdML v2 编程与软件工程 | 76.40Standard Mode ｜ Tools | 77.95Thinking Level · High ｜ Tools | 63.7016K ｜ Tools | -- |
Creative Writing 写作和创作 | 1906.40Standard Mode | 1803.80Standard Mode | 1683.20Standard Mode | -- |
SimpleBench 常识推理 | 62.90Standard Mode | 67.60Standard Mode | 62.00Extended Thinking | 60.00Extended Thinking |
Single-Benchmark Version Trend
Viewing: ARC-AGI-1 · 综合评估
Standard API Pricing Across the Opus 4.7 Series
Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.
Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens
| Model | Supplier | Standard input | Standard output | Base price applies to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Opus 4.7 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | — |
Claude Opus 4.6 | Anthropic | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | — |
Opus 4.5 | Facebook AI研究实验室 | $5 / 1M tokens | $25 / 1M tokens | — |
Opus 4.1 | Anthropic | $15 / 1M tokens | $75 / 1M tokens | — |