DataLearner logoDataLearnerAI
Latest AI Insights
Model Leaderboards
Benchmarks
Model Directory
Model Comparison
Resource Center
Tools
LanguageEnglish
DataLearner logoDataLearner AI

A knowledge platform focused on LLM benchmarking, datasets, and practical instruction with continuously updated capability maps.

Products

  • Leaderboards
  • Model comparison
  • Datasets

Resources

  • Tutorials
  • Editorial
  • Tool directory

Company

  • About
  • Privacy policy
  • Data methodology
  • Contact

© 2026 DataLearner AI. DataLearner curates industry data and case studies so researchers, enterprises, and developers can rely on trustworthy intelligence.

Privacy policyTerms of service
HomeModel CompareDeepSeek-V4-Pro vs GLM 5.1 评测对比

DeepSeek-V4-Pro vs GLM 5.1 评测对比

See key specs and per-benchmark scores for each model/mode. Scroll horizontally for all columns. 当前对比 2 个模型的评测数据与核心参数。

DeepSeek-AI

DeepSeek-V4-Pro

DeepSeek-AI

Release
2026-04-24
Context length
1M
Parameters
16,000 (act 490)
最大输出
384,000 tokens
Model profile·Playground
智谱AI

GLM 5.1

智谱AI

Release
2026-03-27
Context length
200K
Parameters
754 (act 40)
最大输出
128,000 tokens
Model profile·Playground
Loading comparison...

Capability profile

Each axis is a category average, normalized to a 100-point radar.

View: Non-parallel mode average·5 dimensions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro

Relative edge: AI Agent - 信息收集 +2.6 / Relative gap: 数学推理 -12.8

GLM 5.1

Relative edge: 数学推理 +12.8 / Relative gap: AI Agent - 信息收集 -2.6

Method: for each model and benchmark, the chart first averages all scores in the current mode scope instead of taking the best score, then averages those benchmark scores within each category. Only benchmarks with at least two selected models scored are included; missing values are not counted as zero.

Best overall

DeepSeek-V4-Pro · 72.47

Best single

DeepSeek-V4-Pro · GPQA Diamond 90.10

Modality coverage

DeepSeek-V4-Pro · 2 modalities

Head to head

DeepSeek-V4-Pro
4
2
GLM 5.1
AheadTiedBehind

6

Benchmarks

4

Wins

2

Losses

+1.88

Average diff

Performance benchmarks

Compare benchmark results across thinking modes and tool usage.

Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology

Thinking
Tool usage
Internet
Filter: Best Available·2 modes · 6 Benchmark
图表加载中...

Benchmark score table

Complete scores for each model/mode across selected benchmarks.

6 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

BenchmarkDeepSeek-V4-ProGLM 5.1
GPQA Diamond
综合评估
90.10Thinking Level · High
86.20Thinking Enabled
HLE
综合评估
48.20Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
52.30Thinking Enabled | Tools
SWE-Bench Pro - Public
编程与软件工程
55.40Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
58.40Thinking Enabled | Tools
BrowseComp
AI Agent - 信息收集
83.40Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
79.30Thinking Enabled | Tools
Terminal Bench 2.0
AI Agent - 工具使用
67.90Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools
63.50Thinking Enabled | Tools
IMO-AnswerBench
数学推理
89.80Thinking Level · High
83.80Thinking Enabled

API price comparison

Side-by-side input/output token pricing

Detailed feature breakdown

Licensing, MoE architecture, and multi-modality support.

Features & specs
DeepSeek-V4-ProDeepSeek-AI
GLM 5.1智谱AI
Core specsRelease
2026-04-242026-03-27
Context length
1M200K
Parameters
16000754
Active parameters
49040
Max output
384000128000
MoE
YesYes
LicenseCode Open Source
Closed SourceClosed Source
Weights Open Source
Closed SourceClosed Source
Commercial use
免费商用授权免费商用授权
Modality supportText Input/Output
/
/
Image Input/Output
/
Not provided
ResourcesPaper / report
DeepSeek-V4 Technical ReportGLM-5.1: Towards Long-Horizon Tasks