The relationship between metacognitive experiences and learning: Is there a difference between digital and non-digital study media?
作者：
Highlights：
• Two experiments compared metacognitive accuracy for text reading across study media.
• Study media did not influence metacognition, learning, or metacognitive accuracy.
• Metacognition may be less important to “screen inferiority” than previously reported.
摘要
•Two experiments compared metacognitive accuracy for text reading across study media.•Study media did not influence metacognition, learning, or metacognitive accuracy.•Metacognition may be less important to “screen inferiority” than previously reported.
论文关键词：Metacognition,Metacognitive experiences,Digital learning,Reading,Learning outcome,Judgement of learning,Prediction of performance,Confidence rating
论文评审过程：Received 10 December 2014, Revised 18 June 2015, Accepted 22 July 2015, Available online 27 August 2015, Version of Record 27 August 2015.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.043
