Does thinking-aloud affect learning, visual information processing and cognitive load when learning with seductive details as expected from self-regulation perspective?
作者：
Highlights：
• TAPs negatively affected recall, but not comprehension and transfer.
• TAPs affected visual information processing with higher text perception.
• Learners learning with TAPs invested significantly more mental effort.
• The Seductive Details effect was found to be robust against using TAPs.
• TAPs only seem to be a valid method for certain learning investigations.
摘要
•TAPs negatively affected recall, but not comprehension and transfer.•TAPs affected visual information processing with higher text perception.•Learners learning with TAPs invested significantly more mental effort.•The Seductive Details effect was found to be robust against using TAPs.•TAPs only seem to be a valid method for certain learning investigations.
论文关键词：Thinking aloud,Multimedia learning,Cognitive load,Eye-tracking,Self-regulation,Seductive details
论文评审过程：Received 13 November 2019, Revised 27 February 2020, Accepted 1 May 2020, Available online 3 May 2020, Version of Record 24 May 2020.
论文官网地址：https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106411
