GPT-5.5 leads on the shared-benchmark average
Ahead on 21 of 22 shared benchmarks, averaging 6.5 points higher
Summarised only from the 22 percentage-scale benchmarks scored by every selected model; details are below. A further 3 historical, reverse-direction or differently scaled metrics are excluded; indexes, cost and time are not added to accuracy percentages.
“Best available” takes each model’s best recorded non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction per benchmark, so it may combine modes into a virtual configuration that does not exist. Read it with the mode breakdown.

GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Benchmark-by-benchmark comparison. Changing the thinking mode or tool filters updates the chart and table below.
“Best available” picks the best non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction separately for each benchmark. The resulting series can combine several reasoning levels and is not one reproducible runtime configuration. Choose a mode filter to compare like-for-like runs.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Each axis is the mean percentage score of one benchmark domain. It is an average, not a capability rating.
Relative edge: 数学推理 +10.0 / Relative gap: none clear
Relative edge: none clear / Relative gap: 数学推理 -10.0
Method: for each model and benchmark, all scores in the current mode scope are averaged (not the best score), then those benchmark scores are averaged within each domain. Only benchmarks scored on a 0-100 scale by at least two of the selected models count — Elo and rating-scale benchmarks such as Codeforces or Arena are excluded, because averaging a 1500 rating with an 85% accuracy produces a meaningless number. Missing values are not counted as zero, and the averages are unweighted, so domains with harder benchmarks read lower.
Every model and runtime mode, benchmark by benchmark. Values are comparable along a row, not between different benchmarks.
33 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
95.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 93.67Thinking Level · Extra High | |
85.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 77.10Standard Mode | |
27.10Thinking Level · Extra High | 23.40Thinking Level · Extra High | |
52.20Thinking Level · High | Tools | 52.10Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
79.91Deep Thinking Mode | 77.97Deep Thinking Mode | |
94.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 92.00Thinking Level · Extra High | |
1843.50Standard Mode | 1835.60Standard Mode | |
100.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 99.17Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
51.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 47.60Thinking Level · Extra High | |
35.40Thinking Level · Extra High | 27.10Thinking Level · Extra High | |
72.50Thinking Level · Extra High | 49.00Thinking Level · Extra High | |
85.26Thinking Level · Extra High | 78.60Thinking Level · Extra High | |
98.48Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 97.73Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
80.21Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 54.17Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
67.04Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 51.77Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
40.20Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 31.37Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
58.60Thinking Level · High | Tools | 57.70Thinking Level · Extra High | |
1504.74Thinking Level · Extra High | 1457.23Thinking Level · High | |
84.91Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 77.70Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
60.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 57.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
93.90Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 87.10Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
44.59Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 39.43Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
75.90Thinking Level · Extra High | 73.90Thinking Level · Extra High | |
84.40Thinking Level · High | Tools | 82.70Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
75.30Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 70.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
78.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 75.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
82.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 75.10Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
83.10Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 78.30Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
94.18Thinking Level · Extra High | 86.15Thinking Level · Extra High | |
84.30Thinking Level · Extra High | 82.00Thinking Level · Extra High | |
1396.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 1307.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
81.20Thinking Level · Medium | 82.10Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
75.50Thinking Level · High | 75.70Thinking Level · High |
Official list prices per model API, split by input and output. Unit: USD per 1M tokens.
Architecture, licensing and API modalities. "Not provided" means the field is missing from our database.
| Features & specs | GPT-5.5OpenAI | GPT-5.4OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-04-23 | 2026-03-05 |
Context length | 1000K | 1M |
Max output length | 131,072 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
Architecture | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
Runtime modes | 关闭低中高极高最高 | 低中高极高 |
Availability & licensingCode availability | Not public | Not public |
Weight availability | Not public | Not public |
Use & commercial terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms |
API modality supportText Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:Yes | Input:YesOutput:Yes |
Image Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
ResourcesPaper / report | Introducing GPT‑5.5 | Introducing GPT‑5.4 |
DataLearner blog | OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.5:代号 | Not provided |

GPT-5.4
OpenAI