GPT-5 leads on the shared-benchmark average
Ahead on 7 of 8 shared benchmarks, averaging 14.1 points higher
Summarised only from the 8 percentage-scale benchmarks scored by every selected model; details are below. A further 4 historical, reverse-direction or differently scaled metrics are excluded; indexes, cost and time are not added to accuracy percentages.
“Best available” takes each model’s best recorded non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction per benchmark, so it may combine modes into a virtual configuration that does not exist. Read it with the mode breakdown.

GPT-5
OpenAI
Benchmark-by-benchmark comparison. Changing the thinking mode or tool filters updates the chart and table below.
“Best available” picks the best non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction separately for each benchmark. The resulting series can combine several reasoning levels and is not one reproducible runtime configuration. Choose a mode filter to compare like-for-like runs.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Each axis is the mean percentage score of one benchmark domain. It is an average, not a capability rating.
Relative edge: AI Agent - 工具使用 +12.6 / Relative gap: none clear
Relative edge: none clear / Relative gap: AI Agent - 工具使用 -12.6
Method: for each model and benchmark, all scores in the current mode scope are averaged (not the best score), then those benchmark scores are averaged within each domain. Only benchmarks scored on a 0-100 scale by at least two of the selected models count — Elo and rating-scale benchmarks such as Codeforces or Arena are excluded, because averaging a 1500 rating with an 85% accuracy produces a meaningless number. Missing values are not counted as zero, and the averages are unweighted, so domains with harder benchmarks read lower.
Every model and runtime mode, benchmark by benchmark. Values are comparable along a row, not between different benchmarks.
32 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Gemini 2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
65.67Thinking Level · High | 37.00Thinking Enabled | |
9.86Thinking Level · High | 4.86Thinking Enabled | |
5.70Thinking Level · High | 2.60Thinking Enabled | |
35.20Thinking Enabled | Tools | 22.50Thinking Enabled | |
87.30Thinking Enabled | Tools | 86.40Thinking Enabled | |
1360.00Standard Mode | Tools | 1125.00Standard Mode | Tools | |
6.90Thinking Level · High | Tools | 3.92Standard Mode | Tools | |
84.60Thinking Level · High | 80.10Thinking Enabled | |
72.80Thinking Level · High | 67.20Thinking Enabled | |
99.60Thinking Enabled | Tools | 88.00Thinking Enabled | |
26.30Thinking Level · High | Tools | 11.00Standard Mode | |
12.50Thinking Level · High | 2.10Standard Mode | |
11.00Thinking Enabled | 19.00Thinking Enabled | |
29.00Thinking Enabled | 15.20Thinking Enabled | |
59.00Thinking Enabled | 55.20Thinking Enabled | |
20.00Thinking Enabled | 17.60Thinking Enabled | |
1623.50Standard Mode | 1418.90Standard Mode | |
43.80Thinking Enabled | Tools | 25.30Thinking Enabled | |
35.20Thinking Level · High | Tools | 28.50Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
84.20Thinking Level · High | 82.00Thinking Enabled | |
78.40Thinking Enabled | 74.90Thinking Enabled | |
66.00Thinking Level · High | 46.40Standard Mode | |
56.70Thinking Level · High | 62.40Thinking Enabled | |
88.00Thinking Level · High | 83.1032K | |
203.01Thinking Level · High | Tools | 38.73Standard Mode | Tools | |
37.90Thinking Level · Medium | Tools | 25.00Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
95.83Thinking Enabled | Tools | 54.10Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
22.10Thinking Level · High | Tools | 13.66Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
73.10Thinking Level · High | 49.00Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
54.90Thinking Enabled | Tools | 7.80Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
78.20Thinking Level · High | 69.00Thinking Enabled | |
97.20Thinking Level · Medium | 91.70Standard Mode |
Official list prices per model API, split by input and output. Unit: USD per 1M tokens.
Architecture, licensing and API modalities. "Not provided" means the field is missing from our database.
| Features & specs | GPT-5OpenAI | Gemini 2.5-ProGoogle Deep Mind |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2025-08-07 | 2025-06-05 |
Context length | 400K | 1000K |
Max output length | 131,072 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
Architecture | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
Runtime modes | 关闭深度 | 关闭深度 |
Availability & licensingCode availability | Not public | Not public |
Weight availability | Not public | Not public |
Use & commercial terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms |
API modality supportText Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:Yes | Input:YesOutput:Yes |
Image Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
ResourcesPaper / report | Introducing GPT-5 | Try the latest Gemini 2.5 Pro before general availability. |
DataLearner blog | OpenAI发布GPT-5:这是一个包含实时路由的AI系统,而不仅仅是一个模型 | Google发布Gemini 2.5 Pro: Gemini系列第一个2.5版本的模型,最高支持200万上下文,全模态输入,推理大模型,LMArena排名第一 |

Gemini 2.5-Pro
Google Deep Mind