Kimi K2.6 leads on the shared-benchmark average
Ahead on 7 of 11 shared benchmarks, averaging 1.4 points higher
Summarised only from the 11 percentage-scale benchmarks scored by every selected model; details are below.
“Best available” takes each model’s best recorded non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction per benchmark, so it may combine modes into a virtual configuration that does not exist. Read it with the mode breakdown.

Qwen3.7-Plus
阿里巴巴
Benchmark-by-benchmark comparison. Changing the thinking mode or tool filters updates the chart and table below.
“Best available” picks the best non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction separately for each benchmark. The resulting series can combine several reasoning levels and is not one reproducible runtime configuration. Choose a mode filter to compare like-for-like runs.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Each axis is the mean percentage score of one benchmark domain. It is an average, not a capability rating.
Relative edge: 指令跟随 +17.9 / Relative gap: Agent能力评测 -0.5
Relative edge: Agent能力评测 +0.5 / Relative gap: 指令跟随 -17.9
Method: for each model and benchmark, all scores in the current mode scope are averaged (not the best score), then those benchmark scores are averaged within each domain. Only benchmarks scored on a 0-100 scale by at least two of the selected models count — Elo and rating-scale benchmarks such as Codeforces or Arena are excluded, because averaging a 1500 rating with an 85% accuracy produces a meaningless number. Missing values are not counted as zero, and the averages are unweighted, so domains with harder benchmarks read lower.
Every model and runtime mode, benchmark by benchmark. Values are comparable along a row, not between different benchmarks.
12 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | Qwen3.7-Plus | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|
9.10Thinking Enabled | 8.00Thinking Enabled | |
35.60Thinking Enabled | 54.00Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
90.00Thinking Enabled | 90.50Thinking Enabled | |
47.00Thinking Enabled | Tools | 43.90Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
93.00Thinking Enabled | Tools | 95.90Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
17.50Thinking Enabled | Tools | 23.30Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
78.00Thinking Enabled | 76.00Thinking Enabled | |
61.00Thinking Enabled | Tools | 65.90Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
12.20Thinking Enabled | 13.00Thinking Enabled | |
80.50Thinking Enabled | 79.40Thinking Enabled | |
46.10Thinking Enabled | 51.50Thinking Enabled | |
81.79Thinking Enabled | Tools | 84.12Thinking Enabled | Tools |
Official list prices per model API, split by input and output. Unit: USD per 1M tokens.
Architecture, licensing and API modalities. "Not provided" means the field is missing from our database.
| Features & specs | Qwen3.7-Plus阿里巴巴 | Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-05-31 | 2026-04-20 |
Context length | 1M | 256K |
Total parameters | — | 1T |
Active parameters | N/A | 32B |
Max output length | 65,536 tokens | Not provided |
Architecture | Undisclosed | MoE (mixture of experts) |
Runtime modes | 关闭开启 | 关闭开启 |
Availability & licensingCode availability | Not public | Available · Modified MIT |
Weight availability | Not public | Available · Modified MIT |
Use & commercial terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms | 免费商用授权 |
API modality supportText Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:Yes | Input:YesOutput:Yes |
Image Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
Video Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
ResourcesPaper / report | Qwen3.7-Plus | Kimi K2.6: Advancing Open-Source Coding |

Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI