DataLearner logo

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Benchmark Analysis

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview currently shows benchmark results led by GPQA Diamond (3 / 180, score 94.30), LiveCodeBench (3 / 120, score 91.70), LiveBench (3 / 115, score 79.93). This page also compares it with 2 competitor models and 3 predecessor or same-series models, including performance and pricing views when available. 3 source links are attached for reference.

Google 在模型评估中提供了多项基准测试结果。Gemini 3.1 Pro 在以下测试中得分高于 Gemini 3 Pro(括号内为 Gemini 3 Pro 对应分数,所有结果基于 2026 年 2 月数据,使用指定思考模式或无工具设置):

Humanity's Last Exam(学术推理,全集,文本+多模态,无工具):44.4%(37.5%) ARC-AGI-2(抽象推理谜题,ARC Prize Verified):77.1%(31.1%) GPQA Diamond(科学知识,无工具):94.3%(91.9%) Terminal-Bench 2.0(代理终端编码,Terminus-2 harness):68.5%(56.9%) SWE-Bench Verified(代理编码,单次尝试):80.6%(76.2%) LiveCodeBench Pro(竞争性编程,Elo 分数):2887(2439) MMMLU(多语言问答):92.6%(91.8%) MRCR v2(长上下文,128k 平均):84.9%(77.0%)

在多模态理解(MMMU-Pro,无工具)上得分为 80.5%(Gemini 3 Pro 为 81.0%)。在代理工具使用和长上下文等类别中,多数指标也有相应变化。Google 同时提供了与其他模型(如 Claude Sonnet 4.6、Opus 4.6 及 GPT 系列)的比较数据。 模型卡指出,Gemini 3.1 Pro 在前沿安全框架评估中未达到关键能力水平(CCL)警戒阈值,包括 CBRN、cyber 等风险领域。安全评估显示,与 Gemini 3 Pro 相比,部分指标有小幅变化。

Benchmark Results

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

Benchmark Results

Thinking
Tool usage
Internet

General Knowledge

7 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
94.30
3 / 180
MMLU
High
92.60
3 / 65
79.93
3 / 115
77.10
7 / 59
HLE
High
44.40
39 / 163
HLE
HighTools
51.40
18 / 163
0
3 / 6

Coding and Software Engineer

4 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
LiveCodeBench
HighTools
91.70
3 / 120
80.60
10 / 109
54.20
25 / 45
DeepSWE
HighTools
12
10 / 10

Multimodal Understanding

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
MMMU
High
80.50
11 / 28

常识推理

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
Simple Bench
Standard Mode
79.60
2 / 63

Agent Level Benchmark

2 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
99.30
1 / 35
τ²-Bench
HighTools
90.80
2 / 40

Math and Reasoning

3 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
36.90
11 / 60
16.70
20 / 80
16.70
20 / 80

AI Agent - Information Search

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
BrowseComp
HighToolsInternet
85.90
3 / 47

AI Agent - Tool Usage

3 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
MCP-Atlas
HighTools
78.20
7 / 24
70.70
11 / 17
68.50
8 / 46

Claw-style Agent Evaluation

1 evaluations
Benchmark / mode
Score
Rank/total
Pinch Bench
Thinking EnabledTools
86.70
10 / 37

Competitor Comparison

Benchmark scores for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview compared against top models in its class

Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.3
Benchmark categories:
The chart shows each model’s highest score per benchmark within the current filter. Out-of-100 benchmarks use raw heights; out-of-range benchmarks are scaled within that benchmark while labels keep the original scores.

12 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewCurrentClaude Opus 4.6
ARC-AGI-2
综合评估
77.10Thinking Level · High
66.30Extended Thinking
GPQA Diamond
综合评估
94.30Thinking Level · High
91.31Extended Thinking
HLE
综合评估
51.40Thinking Level · High | Tools
53.00Extended Thinking | Tools
MMLU
综合评估
92.60Thinking Level · High
91.05Extended Thinking
LiveCodeBench
编程与软件工程
91.70Thinking Level · High | Tools
76.00Extended Thinking
SWE-bench Verified
编程与软件工程
80.60Thinking Level · High | Tools
80.84Extended Thinking | Tools
MMMU
多模态理解
80.50Thinking Level · High
77.30Extended Thinking | Tools
Simple Bench
常识推理
79.60Standard Mode
67.60Standard Mode
τ²-Bench
Agent能力评测
90.80Thinking Level · High | Tools
91.89Extended Thinking | Tools
τ²-Bench - Telecom
Agent能力评测
99.30Thinking Level · High | Tools
99.25Extended Thinking | Tools
FrontierMath
数学推理
36.90Thinking Level · High
40.70Thinking Level · High
16.70Thinking Level · High
22.90Thinking Level · High
3 additional benchmarks remain in the chart above.

Standard API Pricing: Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs. Peer Models

Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.

Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens

When a context threshold exists, the charted base price only applies within these limits:

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Base price applies to <= 200K
Claude Opus 4.6: Base price applies to <= 200K
ModelSupplierStandard inputStandard outputBase price applies to
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google Deep Mind$2 / 1M tokens$12 / 1M tokens<= 200K
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic$5 / 1M tokens$25 / 1M tokens<= 200K

Version History

How each version of the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview series stacks up on benchmark tests

Benchmark categories:
The chart shows each model’s highest score per benchmark within the current filter. Out-of-100 benchmarks use raw heights; out-of-range benchmarks are scaled within that benchmark while labels keep the original scores.

5 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.· Click a row to view its trend chart.

BenchmarkGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewCurrentGemini 3.0 Pro (Preview 11-2025)Gemini 2.5-ProGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental 03-25
LiveBench
综合评估
79.93Thinking Level · High
73.39Thinking Level · High
58.33Thinking Level · High
--
16.70Standard Mode
18.80Thinking Enabled
2.10Standard Mode
--
BrowseComp
AI Agent - 信息收集
85.90Thinking Level · High | Tools
59.20Thinking Level · High | Tools
7.80Thinking Enabled | Tools
--
MCP-Atlas
AI Agent - 工具使用
78.20Thinking Level · High | Tools
70.30Standard Mode | Tools
--
--
Pinch Bench
OpenClaw智能体能力综合测评
86.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
70.70Thinking Enabled | Tools
--
71.90Thinking Enabled | Tools

Single-Benchmark Version Trend

Viewing: LiveBench · 综合评估

Benchmark
NormalNormal + ToolsThinkingThinking + ToolsDeepDeep + Tools

X-axis shows model and release date, Y-axis shows score; solid lines connect the same mode across versions, while dotted guides align modes within the same generation.

Standard API Pricing Across the Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Series

Shows standard text input and output pricing side by side for each model. If extended-context pricing exists, the chart keeps the base rate and explains the threshold below.

Source: DataLearnerAI. Standard text prices shown here use the default supplier. · USD / 1M tokens

When a context threshold exists, the charted base price only applies within these limits:

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: Base price applies to <= 200K
ModelSupplierStandard inputStandard outputBase price applies to
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google Deep Mind$2 / 1M tokens$12 / 1M tokens<= 200K

Sources