GPT-5.5 leads on the shared-benchmark average
Ahead on 6 of 7 shared benchmarks, averaging 10.1 points higher
Summarised only from the 7 percentage-scale benchmarks scored by every selected model; details are below. A further 2 historical, reverse-direction or differently scaled metrics are excluded; indexes, cost and time are not added to accuracy percentages.
“Best available” takes each model’s best recorded non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction per benchmark, so it may combine modes into a virtual configuration that does not exist. Read it with the mode breakdown.

GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Benchmark-by-benchmark comparison. Changing the thinking mode or tool filters updates the chart and table below.
“Best available” picks the best non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction separately for each benchmark. The resulting series can combine several reasoning levels and is not one reproducible runtime configuration. Choose a mode filter to compare like-for-like runs.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Each axis is the mean percentage score of one benchmark domain. It is an average, not a capability rating.
Relative edge: 数学推理 +17.8 / Relative gap: 编程与软件工程 -2.5
Relative edge: 编程与软件工程 +2.5 / Relative gap: 数学推理 -17.8
Method: for each model and benchmark, all scores in the current mode scope are averaged (not the best score), then those benchmark scores are averaged within each domain. Only benchmarks scored on a 0-100 scale by at least two of the selected models count — Elo and rating-scale benchmarks such as Codeforces or Arena are excluded, because averaging a 1500 rating with an 85% accuracy produces a meaningless number. Missing values are not counted as zero, and the averages are unweighted, so domains with harder benchmarks read lower.
Every model and runtime mode, benchmark by benchmark. Values are comparable along a row, not between different benchmarks.
35 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
95.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 93.50Thinking Level · High | |
85.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 75.80Thinking Level · High | |
27.10Thinking Level · Extra High | 12.00Thinking Level · High | |
52.20Thinking Level · High | Tools | 54.70Extended Thinking | Tools | |
79.91Deep Thinking Mode | 76.53Deep Thinking Mode | |
94.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 94.20Extended Thinking | |
1843.50Standard Mode | 1907.10Standard Mode | |
69.00Standard Mode | 61.70Standard Mode | |
100.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 95.83Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
51.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 43.80Thinking Level · Extra High | |
35.40Thinking Level · Extra High | 22.90Thinking Level · Extra High | |
72.50Thinking Level · Extra High | 31.71Thinking Level · High | |
85.26Thinking Level · Extra High | 70.18Thinking Level · High | |
98.48Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 93.94Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
80.21Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 40.62Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | |
40.20Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 44.12Standard Mode | Tools | |
58.60Thinking Level · High | Tools | 64.30Extended Thinking | Tools | |
1504.74Thinking Level · Extra High | 1562.39Standard Mode | |
84.91Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 76.40Standard Mode | Tools | |
60.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 54.50Standard Mode | Tools | |
93.90Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 88.60Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
44.59Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 40.21Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
75.90Thinking Level · Extra High | 58.60Thinking Level · High | |
84.40Thinking Level · High | Tools | 79.30Extended Thinking | Tools | |
75.30Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 79.10Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
78.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 78.00Extended Thinking | Tools | |
82.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 69.40Extended Thinking | Tools | |
83.10Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 69.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
94.18Thinking Level · Extra High | 46.70Thinking Level · Low | |
84.30Thinking Level · Extra High | 78.70Thinking Level · High | |
50.00Deep Thinking Mode | Tools | 43.75Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
1136.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 1252.00Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
1396.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 1396.00Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
81.20Thinking Level · Medium | 78.80Thinking Level · High | |
75.50Thinking Level · High | 76.01Thinking Level · High |
Official list prices per model API, split by input and output. Unit: USD per 1M tokens.
Architecture, licensing and API modalities. "Not provided" means the field is missing from our database.
| Features & specs | GPT-5.5OpenAI | Opus 4.7Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-04-23 | 2026-04-16 |
Context length | 1000K | 1000K |
Max output length | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
Architecture | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
Runtime modes | 关闭低中高极高最高 | 关闭中高极高扩展 |
Availability & licensingCode availability | Not public | Not public |
Weight availability | Not public | Not public |
Use & commercial terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms |
API modality supportText Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:Yes | Input:YesOutput:Yes |
Image Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
ResourcesPaper / report | Introducing GPT‑5.5 | Introducing Claude Opus 4.7 |
DataLearner blog | OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.5:代号 | Anthropic发布Claude Opus 4.7:编程能力大幅跃升,视觉分辨率提升超3倍,首个搭载网络安全防护机制的旗舰模型! |

Opus 4.7
Anthropic