GPT-5.5 leads on the shared-benchmark average
Ahead on 3 of 6 shared benchmarks, averaging 0.3 points higher
Summarised only from the 6 percentage-scale benchmarks scored by every selected model; details are below. A further 2 historical, reverse-direction or differently scaled metrics are excluded; indexes, cost and time are not added to accuracy percentages.
“Best available” takes each model’s best recorded non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction per benchmark, so it may combine modes into a virtual configuration that does not exist. Read it with the mode breakdown.

GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Benchmark-by-benchmark comparison. Changing the thinking mode or tool filters updates the chart and table below.
“Best available” picks the best non-parallel result in the metric’s stated direction separately for each benchmark. The resulting series can combine several reasoning levels and is not one reproducible runtime configuration. Choose a mode filter to compare like-for-like runs.
Data sourced primarily from official releases (GitHub, Hugging Face, papers), then benchmark leaderboards, then third-party evaluators. Learn about our data methodology
Each axis is the mean percentage score of one benchmark domain. It is an average, not a capability rating.
Relative edge: 数学推理 +18.8 / Relative gap: 综合评估 -4.4
Relative edge: 综合评估 +4.4 / Relative gap: 数学推理 -18.8
Method: for each model and benchmark, all scores in the current mode scope are averaged (not the best score), then those benchmark scores are averaged within each domain. Only benchmarks scored on a 0-100 scale by at least two of the selected models count — Elo and rating-scale benchmarks such as Codeforces or Arena are excluded, because averaging a 1500 rating with an 85% accuracy produces a meaningless number. Missing values are not counted as zero, and the averages are unweighted, so domains with harder benchmarks read lower.
Every model and runtime mode, benchmark by benchmark. Values are comparable along a row, not between different benchmarks.
33 benchmarks with comparable scores. Each model shows its best score; mode label is displayed below.
| Benchmark | GPT-5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
85.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 77.10Thinking Level · High | |
27.10Thinking Level · Extra High | 17.70Thinking Enabled | |
52.20Thinking Level · High | Tools | 51.40Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
79.91Deep Thinking Mode | 77.13Thinking Level · High | |
94.00Thinking Level · Extra High | 94.30Thinking Level · High | |
1843.50Standard Mode | 1488.90Standard Mode | |
69.00Standard Mode | 79.60Standard Mode | |
51.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 36.90Thinking Level · High | |
35.40Thinking Level · Extra High | 16.70Standard Mode | |
71.90Thinking Level · Extra High | 49.00Thinking Enabled | |
67.04Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 11.73Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
40.20Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 22.55Standard Mode | Tools | |
56.10Thinking Level · High | 58.70Thinking Enabled | |
58.60Thinking Level · High | Tools | 54.20Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
1504.74Thinking Level · Extra High | 1461.49Standard Mode | |
84.91Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 72.10Standard Mode | Tools | |
60.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 53.80Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
93.90Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 99.30Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
44.59Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 26.03Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
75.90Thinking Level · Extra High | 77.10Thinking Enabled | |
84.40Thinking Level · High | Tools | 85.90Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
75.30Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 78.20Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
78.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 76.20Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
82.70Thinking Level · High | Tools | 68.50Thinking Level · High | Tools | |
83.10Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 73.80Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
14.60Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 4.00Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
94.18Thinking Level · Extra High | 84.73Thinking Level · High | |
50.00Deep Thinking Mode | Tools | 41.25Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
1396.00Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 904.00Thinking Enabled | |
86.28Thinking Level · Extra High | Tools | 58.85Thinking Enabled | Tools | |
22.60Thinking Level · High | 17.80Thinking Enabled | |
81.20Thinking Level · Medium | 82.40Thinking Enabled | |
75.50Thinking Level · High | 81.01Thinking Level · High |
Official list prices per model API, split by input and output. Unit: USD per 1M tokens.
Architecture, licensing and API modalities. "Not provided" means the field is missing from our database.
| Features & specs | GPT-5.5OpenAI | Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewGoogle Deep Mind |
|---|---|---|
Core specsRelease | 2026-04-23 | 2026-02-20 |
Context length | 1000K | 1M |
Max output length | 131,072 tokens | 65,536 tokens |
Architecture | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
Runtime modes | 关闭低中高极高最高 | 低高 |
Availability & licensingCode availability | Not public | Not public |
Weight availability | Not public | Not public |
Use & commercial terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms | Official service only; subject to provider terms |
API modality supportText Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:Yes | Input:YesOutput:Yes |
Image Input/Output | Input:YesOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
Audio Input/Output | Input:NoOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
Video Input/Output | Input:NoOutput:No | Input:YesOutput:No |
ResourcesPaper / report | Introducing GPT‑5.5 | Gemini 3.1 Pro: A smarter model for your most complex tasks |
DataLearner blog | OpenAI 发布 GPT-5.5:代号 | Not provided |

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Google Deep Mind