Open Source LLM Leaderboard
Track benchmark rankings for open-weight and open-source AI models, then compare score, size, and license signals in one place.
Composite Rankings
There is no single, universally agreed-upon comprehensive AI model ranking, so we selected two representative leaderboards that approach the question from different angles. Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index aggregates scores from 10 standardized benchmarks (coding, math, reasoning, etc.) to measure objective capability. LMArena (formerly Chatbot Arena) ranks models by Elo ratings derived from anonymous crowd-sourced A/B voting, reflecting real-world user preference. Together they offer both an objective and a subjective perspective.
AA Intelligence Index
Full rankingComposite of 10 standardized benchmarks across coding, math, science, reasoning, and agentic tasks.
Updated 2026-06-13



LMArena Text Generation
Full rankingElo ratings from anonymous crowdsourced A/B voting, reflecting real user preference for response quality.
Updated 2026-06-10


Leading model developers
View all 99 organizationsJump to a developer to explore its full model lineup, series, and product lines.
阿里巴巴
OpenAI
Facebook AI研究实验室
Google Deep Mind
智谱AI
DeepSeek-AI
MistralAI
Google Research
Microsoft Azure
Anthropic
Stability AI
百度
字节跳动Seed团队Per-Benchmark Rankings
Filter by math, coding, agent, and more. Switch benchmarks below or jump into a category leaderboard for the full ranking. View all benchmarks.
Recommended models
Ranked by LiveCodeBenchLLM Performance Results
Data source: DataLearnerAIClick any row to open the model page. Tick the checkboxes to compare up to 4 models side by side. Scores shown are the best result across all evaluation modes.
Leaderboard FAQ
Which open-source models appear on this leaderboard?
The leaderboard tracks open-weight or publicly available models — including Llama, Qwen, DeepSeek, Mistral, GLM, and other releases whose weights or code are available under tracked licenses. It may include permissive, non-commercial, or otherwise restricted licenses; closed-weight API-only models such as GPT or Claude are excluded here.
Why do scores for the same model differ across benchmarks?
Each benchmark measures a different capability — reasoning (HLE, ARC-AGI-2), math (AIME, FrontierMath), coding (SWE-bench Verified), agent use (τ²-Bench), and so on. A model tuned for one capability may perform very differently on another, which is exactly why we surface per-benchmark scores rather than a single number.
How often is the leaderboard updated?
Data is revalidated every 5 minutes, and new models or evaluation results are added as soon as they are published. The "Updated on" indicator at the top of the page reflects the most recent data refresh.
How should I read the composite ranking?
The composite view aggregates a model's standing across multiple core benchmarks. It is a useful first filter, but for production decisions you should drill into the specific benchmark closest to your workload — for example, SWE-bench Verified for coding agents, or τ²-Bench for tool-use scenarios.
Can I run these open-source models locally?
Most listed models publish weights on Hugging Face or GitHub and can be served via vLLM, Ollama, llama.cpp, or similar runtimes. Hardware requirements scale with parameter count — a 7B model fits on a single consumer GPU, while 65B+ models typically need multi-GPU or quantized deployment.
Explore more
The leaderboard covers benchmarked models. Browse the full catalog by model, organization, or benchmark.
Browse every tracked model — filter by organization, type, and release date, not just benchmark scores.
BrowseExplore the labs and companies behind these models and their full model lineups.
BrowseDive into each benchmark — what it measures, how it scores, and the full ranking.
Browse








